All Info About London
All Info About
advertise with us
contacting us
Topics
Sign up for
a Free Weekly
All Info About
London
Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe
Powered by
YourMailinglistProvider.com
Shop For Books With Amazon
Advertise on All Info About
We offer extremely competitive rates for businesses of all sizes.
Click here to find out more

 

Torture at the Tower of London
Perhaps the most famous of London's historic landmarks, the Tower of London had a sinister reputation as a place of torture. What are the facts behind its reputation?

The Tower of London is infamous throughout the world as a grim fortress in which, over the centuries, hundreds of prisoners suffered and died. Of all the many uses to which the Tower of London has been put, torture has attracted the largest body of myth and legend, and it has come to dominate the image of the Tower of London in the popular imagination. Behind the legend is a true story, and many of the details of torture in the Tower are well-documented by reliable sources.

Actually torture only occupied a relatively short period of the castle's history, from the 16th to the 17th centuries, and of the prisoners who have passed through the Tower, only a tiny fraction were ever tortured.

It is no coincidence that the period during which torture occurred at the Tower was one of religious upheaval in England and the Government used every available method to gather information with torture became a matter of state policy.

It must be remembered that torture was essentially a matter of gathering information to be used in Law, not a matter of punishing prisoners. In many cases, the victims were deemed to be guilty already, and the aim was not to extract a confession but to find out about co-conspirators, safe-houses, the routes of letters and so on. In the reign of James I, Sir Francis Bacon wrote: "...in the highest cases of treasons, torture is used for discovery, and not for evidence."

Torture has never been officially recognised in English Law as a means of gaining information. The officers who tortured prisoners in the Tower were acting with the knowledge and authority of the highest levels of Government, the Privy Council and the Monarch. Critics claimed that torture was ineffective as well as cruel, and that a man on the rack would say anything to be released. From the mid 17th century onwards, torture was effectively abandoned.

Apart from the instruments themselves, there were other ways of assuring cooperation, such as the very close confinement afforded by a truly tiny cell. In the Tower, the notorious chamber known as 'Little Ease' measured just 1.2m square (4sq ft), and its cramped conditions prevented the prisoner from ever finding a comfortable position. There has been much speculation about the location of Little Ease, although the truth may never be known for certain.

As part of their interrogation, many prisoners were subjected to threats and intimidation - another form of torture, though this time at the discretion of the Lieutenant and Warders. The authorities played on the prisoners' fear: for example, the clerk of the Council introduced John Gerard to 'the master of torture', but Gerard later found out that this was a trick to frighten him, and the man was in fact an artillery officer in the Tower.

A certain amount of information has survived about the individuals who actually tortured prisoners in the Tower. There is an important distinction between those who operated the instruments, and those who questioned the prisoners during each session. The Warders of the Tower (Beefeaters), under the command of the Lieutenant, saw to the physical business of torture. The interrogations themselves were carried out by two or three Commissioners, usually including at least one law officer, such as the Royal Attorney or Solicitor.

One of the most notorious Commissioners was 'Norton the Rackmaster' Thomas Norton, MP and Recorder of London, who interrogated prisoners in the late 1570s and early 1580s. On his death in 1584 he was replaced by Richard Topcliffe, who operated as an interrogator all over England. Topcliffe was fanatically anti-Catholic but held no formal office, and appears to have carried out much of the torturing in person.

While Topcliffe and Norton took to their jobs with near relish, other officers found the duty an unpleasant one. John Gerard later heard that Sir Richard Berkeley resigned as Lieutenant, not wishing to be involved in torture again.

Page 2> The Tower of London: Instruments of Torture
Page 3 > Prisoners Tortured in the Tower of London

Return to Home Page

All Info About Selected Advertisers
Internet Holiday Villas where you can search the world for holiday villas, choose where you want to go and book direct with the property owner. That means you SAVE MONEY - we take no fees, no commission, nothing.

Search
All Info About
FREE London transport on trains, buses and tubes